Your TL;DR
Beginning September 25, 2025, NIH will restrict PIs to six applications per year and ban proposals “substantially developed by AI.” This move aims to safeguard originality, reduce overload in peer review, and ensure fair competition.
Protecting Originality in Research Proposals
On July 17, 2025, NIH released Notice NOT-OD-25-132, introducing two sweeping changes: principal investigators (PIs) will face new limits on how many proposals they can submit per fiscal year, and applications “substantially developed by AI” will be deemed noncompliant.
Researchers may still use AI for grammar, formatting, or administrative polish, but the generation of scientific ideas, hypotheses, aims, or background material by AI is expressly prohibited. Proposals found in violation risk withdrawal without review, institutional sanctions, or even referral to the Office of Research Integrity, underscoring the seriousness of this policy shift.
Why NIH Is Acting Now
Two concerns drove this decision. First, AI-aided proposal drafting risks eroding the originality and intellectual ownership that federally funded research demands. Reviewers are charged with evaluating the ideas and merit of the investigator, not of a large language model.
Second, proposal volume has ballooned. Some PIs have submitted dozens of applications in a single cycle, overburdening review panels and compromising fairness in evaluation. To address this, NIH is capping each PI at six new, renewal, resubmission, or revision applications per NIH fiscal year, beginning with due dates on or after September 25, 2025. Certain mechanisms, such as T-series training awards and R13 conference grants, are excluded, though institutions are expected to monitor closely to prevent over-filing.
At its core, this is about equity. By controlling volume, NIH ensures that all applicants, including early-career researchers, receive a fairer share of reviewer attention.
The Implications for Researchers
For investigators, this marks a turning point in process and strategy. Reliance on AI for drafting must give way to deliberate, human-driven design of research concepts. At the same time, research groups must prioritize quality over quantity, focusing their limited slots on the most competitive projects.
Institutions will play a crucial role. Large universities, medical centers, and research organizations will need to establish new oversight and tracking systems to ensure compliance, as accountability rests not only with individual PIs but also with their organizations. Failure to comply could result in applications being withdrawn without review and could even impact future eligibility.
A Strategic Path Forward
Researchers who adapt early will be best positioned. That means:
- Reframing AI’s role as a tool for grammar, formatting, and administrative consistency, not for generating scientific content.
- Focusing on fewer but stronger proposals, with sharper alignment to NIH priorities and robust significance and innovation sections.
- Implementing oversight systems to monitor PI submissions across departments and avoid accidental overages.
By shifting the emphasis from quantity to quality, NIH hopes to reduce strain on peer review while reinforcing the originality that drives scientific progress.
Why It Matters for the Future of Funding
This policy is more than a compliance requirement; it is a vision for the future of publicly funded research. By setting firm boundaries on AI, NIH reaffirms that human expertise and creative ownership remain at the heart of science. By capping application volume, NIH ensures that reviewers can thoughtfully assess proposals based on their true merit.
The message is clear: proposals must highlight the unique contributions of their authors, and a shift toward fewer, stronger submissions will serve the entire research community.
Ready To Take the Next Step?
We assist our clients in locating, applying for, and evaluating the outcomes of non-dilutive grant funding. We believe non-dilutive funding is a crucial tool for mitigating investment risks, and we are dedicated to guiding our clients through the entire process—from identifying the most suitable opportunities to submitting and managing grant applications.