On Wednesdays, sharing best practices, tips, anything that shows our expertise.
October 1 brings new federal policy changes, but funding-ready organizations need program-level analysis before changing their grants strategy or assumptions.
Performance and evaluation reports may share data, but they answer different questions. Understanding the distinction strengthens compliance and project learning.
A strong narrative can be held hostage by late collaborators, missing letters, unsigned approvals, or incomplete partner materials that the proposal team cannot manufacture at the deadline.
EBHC has appeared on NIH’s SAO list since 2014. Here is what that designation means, and what it does not.
Evaluation delivers results when evidence drives real-time adjustments, not just final reports, creating continuous improvement throughout project implementation.
A technically successful product can still face a long path to market when regulatory evidence, testing, approvals, reimbursement, procurement, or other adoption requirements are not considered alongside the research plan.
Strong documentation gives evaluators the evidence needed to verify implementation, understand outcomes, and tell a credible story about project performance.
External evaluation before award strengthens proposal design, baseline planning, data quality, and your ability to demonstrate meaningful outcomes after implementation begins.
When communicating with funders, it is important to strike a balance between too much and too little detail. 🎤 📢
Explore EBHC’s growing library of practical grant guides, white papers, templates, and tools, with new resources continuing to be added regularly.
