NIH sets new rules: six proposals per year per PI, with strict limits on AI-developed content to protect originality.


NIH sets new rules: six proposals per year per PI, with strict limits on AI-developed content to protect originality.

Turning an innovative idea into a well-structured research plan is one of the most critical steps in preparing a successful SBIR/STTR application.

Many grant writing firms rely entirely on 1099 contractors. That might work for them, but it exposes your startup to unnecessary risk.

New oversight rules demand accountability, efficiency, and measurable impact. Early evaluation can turn compliance into a competitive advantage.

Our secret shopper review of grant consulting firms revealed a troubling pattern. Here’s what we found, and how we’re doing things differently.

Navigating the SBIR/STTR application process can be complex, especially for small businesses that are new to federal funding. Between writing a compelling technical narrative, crafting a detailed budget, and ensuring compliance with federal guidelines, the process requires a significant investment of time and expertise.

Discover the hidden risk in your consulting partner: offshore ghostwriters and 1099 freelancers jeopardize your SBIR proposal’s security and compliance.

Securing non-dilutive funding can be a transformative opportunity for startups, providing the financial support needed to develop and commercialize innovative solutions without giving up equity.

Success-based consultant fees sound harmless, yet paying them from grant dollars can trigger fraud charges and sink your startup.

For startups advancing to Phase II and beyond in the SBIR/STTR program, the cost match requirement can be a pivotal consideration.