National Science Foundation freezes grant review in response to Trump executive orders

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has recently paused its grant review process in response to executive orders from President Donald Trump’s administration that target diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. This suspension is part of a broader initiative to eliminate DEI efforts across federal agencies, emphasizing a shift towards merit-based evaluations.

News article on this – https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/01/27/nx-s1-5276342/nsf-freezes-grant-review-trump-executive-orders-dei-science

This development is critical because it signals a significant shift in the federal funding landscape, potentially affecting the eligibility and success of countless grant proposals. For organizations and researchers, NSF’s freeze on grant reviews tied to DEI policies not only disrupts ongoing funding efforts but also challenges the very framework upon which many projects were built.

DEI initiatives are often integral to innovation, fostering collaboration, equity, and diverse perspectives in research. However, the new merit-based focus may require drastic revisions, creating uncertainty for applicants. Understanding and adapting to these changes is vital for maintaining competitiveness, securing funding, and ensuring compliance with federal agencies’ evolving expectations.

What You Can Do:

  1. Proposal Reassessment: It’s crucial to review your current grant proposals to ensure they align with the NSF’s updated focus on merit-based criteria. Any elements emphasizing DEI should be evaluated and possibly revised to fit the new guidelines. Also…
    • Reconfirm proposal deadlines, as they may change.
    • Verify that funding announcements have not been revised or postponed.
    • Sign up for agency or sponsor alerts, if available.
  2. Review Team Composition: Assess your project team’s qualifications and ensure they are clearly aligned with the expertise required for the proposed work. Highlight credentials and track records that bolster the merit-based evaluation. Ensure your staff is well-informed about these changes, so they can be proactive and aligned in their approach to proposal development.
  3. Refine Evaluation Plans: Since NSF policies may still require accountability for outcomes, refine your proposal’s evaluation methodology. Include clear metrics for success that demonstrate your project’s impact and scalability. (We are already ahead of you on this)
  4. Document Changes: Keep detailed records of any modifications made to proposals or research methodologies in response to the new policies. This documentation can be essential for compliance and future reference. This includes…
    • Expect changes to research compliance requirements (e.g., export control, IRB, IACUC, etc. ).
    • Act swiftly to meet new requirements to avoid jeopardizing funding.
  5. Focus on Innovation and Impact Metrics: Highlight quantifiable innovation metrics, such as job creation, economic development, or scientific breakthroughs, to make a strong case for funding.
  6. Prepare for Audits and Scrutiny: With increased emphasis on merit, be prepared for heightened scrutiny of budgets, methodologies, and outcomes. Strengthen your internal processes for transparency and compliance.
  7. Engage with Program Officers: Maintain open lines of communication with NSF program officers. They can provide valuable insights into how the new directives impact specific funding opportunities and offer guidance on proposal adjustments.
  8. Stay Informed: The policy landscape is rapidly evolving. Regularly consult official NSF communications and reputable news sources to stay updated on further changes that may affect grant processes.
  9. Anticipate Additional Review Delays: Plan for potential delays in grant approvals and funding disbursements. Adjust project timelines and budgets accordingly to maintain operational continuity.
  10. Monitor Related Policy Changes: Policies affecting NSF may signal broader shifts across other federal agencies. Keep a watchful eye on similar developments in NIH, DOE, and other funders.
  11. Develop a Contingency Plan: Prepare a “Plan B” in case your NSF grant application is delayed or not approved. Identify other potential funding avenues or scale projects to fit available resources.
  12. Bonus: Breathe. We got you. Schedule a call with us if you need to work through some strategies.

By proactively adapting to these developments, EBHC clients can navigate the evolving funding environment and continue to advance their research initiatives effectively.


Ready To Take the Next Step?

We assist our clients in locating, applying for, and evaluating the outcomes of non-dilutive grant funding. We believe non-dilutive funding is a crucial tool for mitigating investment risks, and we are dedicated to guiding our clients through the entire process—from identifying the most suitable opportunities to submitting and managing grant applications.