Submitting an SBIR/STTR proposal is a significant milestone, but what happens next can feel like a mystery. Once your proposal is in the hands of reviewers, a series of detailed steps unfolds to determine whether your project will be funded. Understanding this process can help you manage expectations, anticipate timelines, and prepare for next steps. Here’s what you need to know about the review process.
The Journey of Your Proposal
Once you’ve uploaded your completed proposal to the submission portal, several key phases take place:
1. Administrative and Compliance Check
The first step after submission is an administrative review to ensure that your proposal meets the basic eligibility and formatting requirements.
- What reviewers check: They confirm that you’ve submitted all required documents, adhered to formatting guidelines, and completed necessary registrations.
- Outcome: Proposals that fail this check are often returned without further review. It’s essential to triple-check compliance before submitting.
2. Assignment to Review Panels
After passing the initial compliance check, your proposal is assigned to a review panel based on its topic area and the expertise required.
- Agency-Specific Panels: Some agencies, like NIH, use peer reviewers from academic and research institutions, while others, like DoD, rely on technical experts within their agency.
- Tailoring: Your proposal’s content determines which panel or program officer will review it, so it’s crucial to align your application with the funding agency’s mission and focus areas.
3. Scientific and Technical Evaluation
The scientific merit of your proposal is evaluated during this phase.
- What reviewers look for:
- Innovation: Does the proposal present a novel solution or approach?
- Feasibility: Is the technical plan achievable within the proposed budget and timeline?
- Impact: Does the research have the potential to make a significant contribution to the field?
- Scoring: Most agencies use a scoring system to rank proposals. For example, NIH assigns a numeric score that reflects the strengths and weaknesses of each section.
4. Commercialization Review
SBIR/STTR programs emphasize commercialization potential as much as technical innovation.
- Key questions:
- Is there a clear pathway to market?
- Does the team have a strong commercialization plan?
- Is there a demonstrated market need for the solution?
Programs like NSF and DoD pay particular attention to how the project aligns with real-world applications and market demands.
What Happens After the Review
Once the review process is complete, proposals are categorized based on their scores and recommendations.
1. Funding Recommendations
Review panels make funding recommendations to the program officers, who consider these scores alongside budget constraints and program priorities.
- Competitive Range: Proposals with high scores may be recommended for funding, but the final decision depends on available resources.
2. Feedback to Applicants
Regardless of the outcome, most agencies provide detailed reviewer feedback.
- Strengths: Highlighting areas where the proposal excelled.
- Weaknesses: Identifying sections that need improvement for future submissions.
This feedback is invaluable for refining your approach, whether you plan to resubmit or apply for a different funding opportunity.
Key Timelines and Notifications
The time between submission and notification can vary depending on the agency and the type of solicitation.
- Typical Timeline: Many agencies notify applicants within 4-6 months after submission.
- Phased Notifications: For multi-phase programs, you may receive preliminary updates before the final award notification.
Program officers may also reach out for clarification during the review process, particularly if they need more information to finalize their decision.
Common Outcomes of the Review Process
- Awarded: Your proposal is selected for funding, and you’ll receive details about the next steps, including contract negotiations and reporting requirements.
- Declined with Feedback: Proposals that were not selected are often accompanied by reviewer comments, which can guide your resubmission strategy.
- Returned Without Review: This occurs when submissions fail to meet compliance or eligibility requirements.
Using Reviewer Feedback to Improve
If your proposal isn’t funded on the first try, don’t be discouraged. Many successful awardees secure funding after resubmitting an improved proposal.
- Identify Common Themes: Look for repeated comments that highlight weaknesses.
- Address Reviewer Concerns: Incorporate additional data, pilot results, or collaborations to strengthen weak points.
- Clarify Objectives: Ensure that your technical and commercialization plans are easy to follow and aligned with program goals.
Persistence is key. In 2020, the success rate for NIH resubmissions was 18%, compared to 11% for first-time submissions.
Understanding the SBIR/STTR review process provides valuable insight into what happens after submission and how decisions are made. Whether your proposal is awarded or returned with feedback, each review cycle offers an opportunity to refine your approach and increase your chances of success.
At E.B. Howard Consulting, we collaborate with startups to navigate the submission and review process, interpret feedback, and build stronger proposals. If you’re preparing for an SBIR/STTR application or planning a resubmission, contact us today to create a strategy that positions your innovation for success.
Ready To Take the Next Step?
We assist our clients in locating, applying for, and evaluating the outcomes of non-dilutive grant funding. We believe non-dilutive funding is a crucial tool for mitigating investment risks, and we are dedicated to guiding our clients through the entire process—from identifying the most suitable opportunities to submitting and managing grant applications.