Your TL;DR: The Army’s xTech Adaptive Strike competition is offering up to $1.5 million in cash prizes for ready-to-deploy solutions in four high-priority capability areas. This is not a traditional SBIR. It is a fast-moving, operationally grounded opportunity with real Soldier touchpoints. If your technology is mature and aligned, this can open doors quickly. If it is still theoretical, the exposure may outpace the readiness.
The Attention Grab: $1.5 Million and Direct Soldier Access
The U.S. Army FUZE xTech Program has opened submissions for the xTech|Adaptive Strike competition, with awards totaling up to $1.5 million in cash prizes. Concept white papers and required videos are due by 5:00 PM ET on March 13, 2026.
On the surface, that headline writes itself. Prize money. Army visibility. Live Soldier exercises in June and October 2026. Direct feedback from Department of War (DoW) experts.
Underneath, though, this competition signals something more specific. The Army is not fishing for early-stage ideas. It is asking for cutting-edge, ready-to-deploy solutions that can strengthen front-line units against rapidly evolving threats.
If you are weighing whether to invest time in a submission, this is where discernment matters. If you would value a candid read on whether your technology is positioned appropriately for this type of opportunity, EBHC can offer a perspective grounded in how these decisions are actually made.
The Four Focus Areas Tell You How the Army Is Thinking
The competition is centered around four capability needs:
- Extended on-station time and range for medium and long-range reconnaissance
- Affordable drones and loitering munitions for scaled operations
- Power generation for ground units with sUAS
- Counter-unmanned aerial systems defeat for Soldier operations
These are not abstract research themes. They reflect operational pain points. The Army is signaling urgency around endurance, affordability at scale, power resilience, and counter-UAS effectiveness at the Soldier level.
This matters for positioning. Submissions that simply restate technical specifications will struggle. The evaluators will be asking whether the solution meaningfully shifts operational advantage, improves protection, or sustains tempo in contested environments.
That is a different lens than a typical R&D-heavy SBIR Phase I.
Why This Is Not “Just Another” Competition
xTech competitions sit at the intersection of scouting and signaling. They are designed to:
- Surface commercially developed technologies that may not yet be in the defense pipeline
- Provide rapid technical feedback from acquisition and operational stakeholders
- Create visibility between innovators and program offices
There is also something structurally important here: semifinals and finals include live Soldier exercise events with Army and DoW experts. That means your technology will not be judged solely on paper. It will be scrutinized for real-world usability, integration friction, and mission relevance.
This is where many promising companies miscalculate.
They assume that strong engineering equals strong positioning. In reality, Army evaluators are scanning for feasibility under field conditions, alignment with acquisition pathways, and credible transition potential.
The GAP appears when a company with impressive technology submits a concept that does not clearly map to operational adoption, and the opportunity quietly closes.
Submission Strategy: What Deserves Your Focus
Concept white papers and videos are required. That alone should prompt a strategic pause.
Video submissions introduce narrative and demonstration risk. If your team cannot clearly articulate the mission problem, the environment, and the integration pathway in a concise and credible way, the format may amplify weaknesses.
Strong submissions will do three things:
- Anchor the technology in a specific operational use case.
- Demonstrate technical maturity, not speculative promise.
- Signal an understanding of how the Army transitions solutions beyond a prize event.
The xTech Adaptive Strike competition is sponsored by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, in collaboration with operational and innovation units. That sponsorship should shape your tone. This audience thinks in terms of capability gaps, fielding timelines, logistics burdens, and sustainment realities.
EBHC regularly works at the intersection of technical merit and evaluation criteria, advising innovators on how agencies actually assess risk, scalability, and mission alignment. That perspective often determines whether a submission is merely compliant or strategically compelling.
Is This the Right Door for You?
This competition offers more than prize money. It offers exposure, feedback, and potential access to decision-makers who influence future procurement and pilot opportunities. It also demands readiness.
If your solution is already validated, field-relevant, and aligned with one of the four focus areas, this could be a high-leverage move. If your technology still requires foundational R&D, a more traditional SBIR, STTR, or other phased funding path may provide a stronger runway.
The March 13 deadline leaves little room for improvisation. This is not the time for reactive drafting.
If you are deciding whether to pursue xTech|Adaptive Strike or allocate resources elsewhere, a strategic conversation about fit and positioning can save significant time and effort.
Signal, Not Just Submission
The Army is signaling where it needs immediate advantage: endurance, scalable unmanned systems, resilient power, and counter-UAS capability at the Soldier level.
Competitions like xTech|Adaptive Strike reward companies that understand not only their technology, but the operational ecosystem in which it must survive.
Prize funding is attractive. Direct access to Army stakeholders is powerful. Neither compensates for a submission that fails to translate innovation into operational credibility.
If you want a second set of eyes on your white paper or video narrative before the March 13 deadline, EBHC can provide grounded feedback shaped by real evaluation experience within the federal innovation landscape.
Ready To Take the Next Step?
We assist our clients in locating, applying for, and evaluating the outcomes of non-dilutive grant funding. We believe non-dilutive funding is a crucial tool for mitigating investment risks, and we are dedicated to guiding our clients through the entire process—from identifying the most suitable opportunities to submitting and managing grant applications.