Testing How Different Agencies Align with Each Stage of Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs)

When pursuing government funding, understanding how different agencies align their programs and expectations with Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) is essential. Each agency uses TRLs to ensure technologies meet their unique mission requirements, but the emphasis and expectations can vary. This guide explores how agencies like NASA, the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DOE), and others align their programs to TRLs, helping innovators better tailor their proposals and development strategies.


Specific Agencies and TRL Focus

  1. NASA: Pioneering Advanced Technologies
    • Focus: Early-stage innovation and high-risk, high-reward research.
    • Alignment:
      • TRL 1–3: Fundamental research and proof of concept. Programs like NASA’s Early Stage Innovations fund basic science and concept exploration.
      • TRL 4–6: Technology validation in lab or simulated environments, supported by programs like Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I and II.
      • TRL 7–9: Prototype demonstration in space-relevant environments. Programs like Flight Opportunities and partnerships with missions take technology to operational levels.
    • Key Insight: NASA emphasizes the transition from theoretical science to practical application in space.
  2. Department of Defense (DoD): Mission-Ready Innovation
    • Focus: Operational prototypes and technologies that enhance military readiness.
    • Alignment:
      • TRL 3–4: SBIR Phase I programs often fund feasibility studies and early proof of concept.
      • TRL 5–6: Phase II focuses on validating and prototyping in environments relevant to defense missions.
      • TRL 7–9: Rapid prototyping and transition to operational use are critical. DoD often uses Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements or Phase III awards for scaling technologies.
    • Key Insight: The DoD expects clear deliverables and pathways to deployment for solutions addressing warfighter needs.
  3. Department of Energy (DOE): Energy and Environmental Solutions
    • Focus: Clean energy technologies, sustainability, and grid modernization.
    • Alignment:
      • TRL 2–4: Programs like DOE’s ARPA-E fund breakthrough ideas and early-stage research.
      • TRL 5–7: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) programs focus on demonstrating technologies in pilot settings.
      • TRL 8–9: Commercialization support comes through initiatives like the Loan Programs Office (LPO) and partnerships with industry leaders.
    • Key Insight: DOE prioritizes innovations that demonstrate real-world potential for environmental and economic impact.
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH): Biomedical and Health Innovation
    • Focus: Translating basic research into clinical applications.
    • Alignment:
      • TRL 2–4: NIH SBIR Phase I supports exploratory research and feasibility studies for medical technologies.
      • TRL 5–6: Phase II funds development and validation of medical devices, drugs, and diagnostics.
      • TRL 7–9: NIH emphasizes clinical trials and regulatory approval processes for market readiness.
    • Key Insight: NIH aligns TRLs closely with FDA approval pathways, making regulatory planning a critical part of development.
  5. Department of Homeland Security (DHS): Security and Resilience
    • Focus: Advanced technologies for disaster response, cybersecurity, and border security.
    • Alignment:
      • TRL 3–4: SBIR Phase I evaluates feasibility of security-focused technologies.
      • TRL 5–6: Phase II supports prototype development for real-world testing in security contexts.
      • TRL 7–9: Technologies must demonstrate operational utility, often in collaboration with first responders or security agencies.
    • Key Insight: DHS prioritizes deployable solutions that address specific national security challenges.

Key Takeaways for Innovators

  1. Match Your Technology’s TRL to the Right Program: Each agency targets specific TRLs for their funding opportunities. Accurately assess your technology’s readiness and align it with the appropriate program.
  2. Understand Agency Priorities: Tailor your proposal to the mission focus of the agency. For instance, NASA values space application, while the DoD looks for military impact, and the DOE emphasizes sustainability.
  3. Plan for TRL Progression: Agencies expect your technology to advance during the performance period. Clearly articulate how you will move from your current TRL to the next stage.
  4. Be Ready to Transition: Agencies like the DoD and DHS focus heavily on transitioning technologies to operational use. Including a commercialization or deployment strategy can strengthen your proposal.

By understanding how different agencies align their funding programs with TRLs, innovators can strategically position their technologies for success. Whether you’re building the next-generation AI for defense, renewable energy solutions, or life-saving medical devices, TRLs provide a clear framework for charting your innovation’s path from concept to impact.


Ready To Take the Next Step?

We assist our clients in locating, applying for, and evaluating the outcomes of non-dilutive grant funding. We believe non-dilutive funding is a crucial tool for mitigating investment risks, and we are dedicated to guiding our clients through the entire process—from identifying the most suitable opportunities to submitting and managing grant applications.